Will Newt Gingrich ride into the White House on crest of belittled and mocked Lame Stream Media reporters. Saturday night, Juan Williams tried carrying water for the Obama campaign, and go humiliated for his efforts. Last night, ignoring Williams’ carcass, and got more of the Newt Treatment, from Don Surber, Daily Mail (WV)video:
Reax:
“The audience gave Newt Gingrich a standing ovation for his response at to a question about whether he asked his second wife for an open marriage, which was the opening question at Thursday night’s CNN Republican presidential debate.
Gingrich turned John King’s question around, saying, “I think the destructive, vicious, negative nature of much of the news media makes it harder to govern this country, harder to attract decent people to run for public office. And I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that.”
The former House speaker categorically denied the allegation that his second wife, Marianne, apparently made in an interview that ABC News has yet to broadcast.
Every adult of voting age knows several divorced people. It is fair to say, that the nastiest phrase in the language is ‘the ex.” The phrase is wielded like a tomahawk and for the same purpose. There is no purpose in interviewing an divorced person, on the subjecvt of their former, other than to dig for dirty. John King, how does it feel to be covered in your own dirt?
Tags: ABC News, age, allegation, auto, carcass, CNN, country, crest, daily mail, dirt, dirty john, Don Surber, Draft, House, house speaker, john king, juan williams, language, Media, media reporters, Mentum, nature, nbsp, negative nature, Newt, newt gingrich, Obama, open marriage, person, phrase, Republican, republican presidential debate, second wife, standing ovation, stream, stream media, Thursday, tomahawk, topic, video, voting age, will, Williams
Print This Post
Subscribe to RSS feed
January 20th, 2012 at 18:22
The republican field is down to two conservative canidates, the adore-mentioned Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Take your pick. There is much to say or and against either.
As for Mitt Romney, has never taken any position which is not subject to change and Ron Paul is not sane.