Purported fashion model Emily Ratajkowski announced she, and husband, are with child. She further stated that she would not know her child’s sex gender until he it turns eighteen. From where Ratajkowski concocted her age of eighteen beats me. Social Justice Warrior insist, sans evidence, that gender is assigned at birth, by some unknown entity, somewhere, they just don’t know where. The moron from Delaware, b/k/a Slow Joe, argues that an eight year old is old enough to be castrated with parental consent.
From Federalist [1]:
She moves on to lament how “unfair” pregnancy
seems, resenting that biology does not respect the feminist ideal of perfect equality between the sexes for growing a baby. “My husband has no physical symptoms in ‘our’ pregnancy, another reminder of how different a woman and man’s experience of life can be,” she writes.This resentment of men is a central tenet for extreme feminists like Ratajkowski, who was proudly arrested at a protest over the Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. The belief in an oppressive patriarchy is one that fights against not just science, but all of human history. As Camille Paglia famously wrote, “If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts.[*]”
It may come as a shock to Ms. Ratajkowski but Mother Nature is not a feminist. Moreover, he ungendered clump of cells is already one of but two sexes, either male or female. It will not take Baby Ratajkowski eighteen years to figure it out.
* Albeit with very fine drapes, as per Kate’s Law(Small Dead Animals)