The Supreme Nine in their infinite wisdom has forbade the death penalty for rapists. So why do liberals who profess to take their moral guidance from the Supreme Court insist that killing produce of a rape, to wit a living human being, is a mere choice> Robert Stacy McCain weighs in, from Other McCain [1]:
Akin’s fundamental problem is that he was arguing the wrong point.
Whenever supporters of abortion start throwing up arguments based on exceptions, the proper response is to point out that well over 90 percent of abortions have nothing whatsoever to do with such exceptions, but are strictly a matter of choice: post-conception birth control. And the pre-Roe history demonstrated that permitting abortion under specific exceptions resulted in those exceptions being abused. The rape exception resulted in false accusations of rape, and the “health” exception resulted in doctors fictionalizing health risks, including false determinations of mental health risks.
Fact, Norma McCorvey, b/k/a Jane Roe, lied about being raped. No human being should be killed just because he was fathered by a rapist, and more importantly, no human being should b e killed just because he mother lied ab out being raped.
Aside to Mr. Akin: Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.