Professor Althouse [1] gets it:
Everyone should perceive flaws! To talk about “sceptics” as the ones who will “seize” upon “evidence” of flaws is unwittingly to make global warming into a matter of religion and not science. It’s not the skeptics who look bad. “Seize” sounds willful, but science should motivate us to grab at evidence.
The belief in anthropogenic global warming is not based on science. Rather is based on religion.
Imagine where the state of science might be is Albert Einstein had note seized on th4 flaws of Sir Isaac Newton’s Laws of Mechanics? And in turn Niels Bohr to Einstein.