Rush Exposes Another Enviromental Wacko

Listen, as Rush Limbaugh nails another environmental wacko and fraud, video:

Transcript:

LIMBAUGH: I think these militant environmentalists, these wackos, have so much in common with the jihad guys. Let me explain this. What do the jihad guys do? The jihad guys go to families under their control and they convince these families to strap explosives on who? Not them. On their kids. Grab your 3-year-old, grab your 4-year-old, grab your 6-year-old, and we’re gonna strap explosives on there, and then we’re going to send you on a bus, or we’re going to send you to a shopping center, and we’re gonna tell you when to pull the trigger, and you’re gonna blow up, and you’re gonna blow up everybody around you, and you’re gonna head up to wherever you’re going, 73 virgins are gonna be there. The little 3- or 4-year-old doesn’t have the presence of mind, so what about you? If it’s so great up there, why don’t you go? Why don’t you strap explosives on you — and their parents don’t have the guts to tell the jihad guys, “You do it! Why do you want my kid to go blow himself up?” The jihad guys will just shoot ’em, ’cause the jihad guys have to maintain control.

The environmentalist wackos are the same way. This guy from The New York Times, if he really thinks that humanity is destroying the planet, humanity is destroying the climate, that human beings in their natural existence are going to cause the extinction of life on Earth — Andrew Revkin. Mr. Revkin, why don’t you just go kill yourself and help the planet by dying?

Hat tip:  Media Splatters.

This one is so simple, that even a libtard ought to be able to understand it.   If Andrew Revkin honestly believes that people are bad for the planet, then Andrew Revkin is bad for the planet.   As Mr.  Revkin seems to have no intent of ridding Planet Earth of himself,  it is  quite apparent that Revkin does not believe what he writes.

The aforementioned Mr. Revkin,  New York Times:

I’d like to think that Rush Limbaugh was floating a thought experiment, and not seriously proposing something, when he told millions of listeners the following: “Mr. Revkin, why don’t you just go kill yourself, and help the planet by dying.”

He had picked up on some commentary and reports that have been bouncing around the instanet ever since I spoke via Skype video at a symposium on media coverage of the population part of the climate and energy challenge, put on by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

I, like Rush, have no desire to see Mr.  Revkin join his enviromental wacko version of seventy-two virgins.   I say  Mr.  Revkin’s lack of desire to indicate any belief in the words he writes is sufficient and amble reason for Mr. Revkin to quite spouting such nonsense.  What say you?