I commented the other day about this resolution about Turkey, and genocide, by suggesting that there was no way that the Democrats could be this stupid by accident, and that therefore it had to be intentional. Neal Boortz this morning addresses this one:
The resolution making its way through Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives is really starting to make some waves. What resolution? That would be the one condemning the Ottoman Empire for the massacre of Armenians almost 100 years ago. The Ottoman Empire of then would be the Turkey of now … and the Turks are less than thrilled with this resolution.
So .. why the big rush to get this resolution passed right NOW? Aren’t there more important things for the congress to attend to? Have they passed all of the budgets they are required to pass? Oops … don’t think so! But maybe there is a reason that Pelosi and the MoveOn Democrats are pushing this issue right now. Maybe they’re trying to make Turkey so damned mad at us that they’ll withdraw permission for our military to use their airbases and airspace in the war against Islamic fascism. Maybe, as Thomas Sowell puts it, this is pure and simple Sabotage .
This never crossed my mind … but it seems it occurred to Jed Babbin. Is Pelosi backing this Armenian resolution thing as a way to derail our war effort in Iraq?  Would she resort to something this underhanded? Why HELL YES she would!
It’s the only logical reason for the push , frankly, to get this passed. This kind of thing was more or less my concern when we started arguing, back before the midterm elections, about the effects of “balanced government”. I was told, by my detractors at the time, that a Congress so hobbled would not be able to do any major damage. And it’s right enough, that this is not a major bill, it’s a nonbinding resolution. Yet, who can argue that this nonbinding resolution’s passage will not be damaging to United States foreign policy, and therefore the world?
At the bottom line, what we have here is the Democrats still struggling mightily to aid in the defeat of the United States, and it’s allies. last I knew, that was called “treason”.
What is particularly annoying to me, is that Queen Nancy and company haven’t bothered to give us the real reason, in their own words, for this push. I guess it could be called a stealth attack, accurately. But I suppose if you are working for the defeat of the United States, I you wouldn’t come out and say it , would you?