- BitsBlog - https://bitsblog.com -

Kerry Vs. Kerry

Bill Kristol [1]:

“JOHN KERRY said yesterday that Iraq was ‘the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time.’ Translation: We would be better off if Saddam Hussein were still in power.
Not an unheard of point of view. Indeed, as President Bush pointed out today, it was Howard Dean’s position during the primary season. On December 15, 2003, in a speech at the Pacific Council on International Policy in Los Angeles, Dean said that ‘the capture of Saddam Hussein has not made America safer.’ Dean also said, ‘The difficulties and tragedies we have faced in Iraq show the administration launched the war in the wrong way, at the wrong time, with inadequate planning, insufficient help, and at the extraordinary cost, so far, of $166 billion.’

But who challenged Dean immediately? John Kerry. On December 16, at Drake University in Iowa, Kerry asserted that ‘those who doubted whether Iraq or the world would be better off without Saddam Hussein, and those who believe today that we are not safer with his capture, don’t have the judgment to be president or the credibility to be elected president.’

Kerry was right then.”

Yep. Here’s Kerry’s problem, in a nutshell;
Everything he says, he’s already argued both sides of, twice. Thus, people simply do not trust him…. even people who once did.