Let’s consider all the Democratic women wearing white at the State of the Union speech the other night. it seems clear to me that the people participating in that little escapade have no clue as to the history of the thing.

Suffragettes wearing white started with theit first meeting at the Park Avenue NYC apartment of Henrietta Wells Livermore, in 1910. That group later attached itself to the Republican Party becoming The National Women’s Republican Club.

Kind of makes you wonder if they understand the history of the thing, huh?

So what we have here is the group of Democrats trying to falsely claim the mantle of women’s rights and the suffragette movement when historically, the Democrat Party is opposed to such things.

Bring that up to today… And let’s consider their success rates in operating on what they claim as their signature issue. Again, that turns out to be false as well.

Doesn’t it strike you as interesting, that the Democrats had the presidency for eight years, and an overwhelming majority of both houses of Congress for the majority of those years, and yet their tactics haven’t worked to their stated goals? In spite of all facts, the Democrats still claim discrimination.

It’s as I’ve been saying for a long time. The worst thing you can possibly do to a Democrat is actually solve a problem or prove to them that it doesn’t exist because you remove any chance for them to demagogue the thing, and thereby attain power.

In any event, why would they decide to go off in this direction? Because nothing else but they’ve been doing for the last 2 years and longer has aided them in their quest for power.

And that, dear reader, is what this has always been about.

3 Responses to “Let’s Examine the Wearing of White At the SOTU.”

  1. What the hell can be expected from a bunch of flat ugly broads not smart enough to know white isn’t worn after Labor Day?

    Somebody should have knocked Susie B off the overhang of the Powers Hotel when it would have had benefit.

    Fortunately UNION Public Education has delivered squadrons of dullards who believe “progressive” crap.

  2. I don’t know.  Am confused.  Is it better go compare the demwym to sheep or to members of the KKK women’s branch wearing white to support Ralph Northman?

  3. Can’t compare em to the KKK, them girls had a mission and ambition.

    How about a convention of pathetic waitresses who weren’t good enough to cut it on the overnight shift because they didn’t have time to fill the salt & sugar dispensers due to a huge ass and pathetic attitude.  Put some iron on patches on them uniforms they’d be perfect for the lunch shift at the Wilshire on Lyell.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Comments will be closed on Tuesday, February 19, 2019.

My rules are simple; This is my place, which gives me the right to do anything I jolly well please with it, including editing, or even rejecting your comments. By submitting a comment here you agree to these rules. -Eric (Bithead)