Eric questioned Fearless Leader’s, b/k/a Special Counsel Robert Mueller timing   Mark Tapscott questions Fearless Leader’s motives, from Lifezette:

The point of the indictment is to set the predicate for Mueller’s forthcoming case that Trump’s campaign knew in advance about the staged releases and prepared campaign strategy accordingly. And that will be called “collusion.”

Can anybody explain how “attempted hacking” can be established without ever having access to the computer systems alleged to be targeted?  Might be time to start a Go Fund me page to bring over the twelve Boris Badinoff’s?