Muddy Water

• ? Over at Q and O Bruce ^[1] goes into some detail on Hillary Clinton trying to point the finger at anybody and anything but Hillary Clinton for her loss in the recent presidential election.

It may be fake news, but it supports the building narrative.  It also supports the idea that one should never, ever take anything printed or televised as news by the MSM at face value until there is real evidence of wrong-doing or whatever it is they’re claiming.  They’re simply not to be trusted with the truth.

What’s this really all about?  Sour grapes.  The refusal of the Democrats and the left to accept the election results (something they lectured Republicans and the right about prior to the “unthinkable” happening, i.e. “revenge of the deplorables.”

. Sorry, Bruce I’m not buying that one either. There’s something more Sinister than that going on. I say to him in comments…
Does anybody remember Ted Kennedy sending a letter to the Russians back in 1984 trying to delegitimize the election of Ronald Reagan?

Does anybody remember the hell-raising that Al Gore brought to the table over his losing the election?

There’s more to this list of course but you get the point I think. It’s impossible to look at the current situation without examining the history of the thing.

And by the way let’s also remember that several laws were broken to provide the Russians with uranium. And now based on what Hillary Clinton’s people are saying it was the Russians that caused her to lose the election? I don’t think so.

Even if we ignore this, does anybody really think that if the Russians were going to hack the election that they would allow Hillary Clinton to win the popular vote?

I mean, look. Anybody who’s read anything I’ve written in the last year knows full well that I am no way a Donald Trump supporter. The fact of the matter is that absent Hillary Clinton’s criminality there is no way Donald Trump wins the presidency.

And isn’t that the real Point here? We’re not just talking about covering up a political loss. We’re talking about muddying the water to prevent prosecution for criminality on a scale seldom seen at these levels of government previously.
Stalin you see taught his lessons well.

At the end of the day all this is about muddying the water so as to prevent effective prosecution. The Democrats know full well that there is a chance albeit a small one, that Donald Trump will actually have the stones to respond to the public outcry for Democrat blood.

If you doubt me on this, ask George Zimmerman about the value of a narrative that is well entrenched before facts show up.