Pigs of a hoof eat together. Who knew that the presidential candidate,sometimes known a Pig in Pants Suit, would recruit a former Miss Universe, so would have it believed that she was referred to as Miss Piggy? From Kathleen Parker, Chicago Tribune:

The former Miss Universe of 1996 has risen from the ashes of former fame to become the nom du jour thanks to some delight-inducing opposition research by the Hillary Clinton campaign. As everyone now knows, Donald Trump was once nasty to Machado, whose coronation as the most beautiful figure in the world apparently coincided with the arrival of her appetite.

According to Machado, who has appeared on numerous talk shows, Trump called her “Miss Piggy,” “eating machine,” and “Miss Housekeeper,” by which we are to infer that he was cruel, lacking in compassion — though he says he interceded when pageant officials wanted to fire her — and a classist, racist, misogynist ogre.

From Washington Times:

Running to be the first woman president, Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has taken a stern stand on combating sexual harassment and assault — and has insisted that every accuser who comes forward has “the right to be believed.”

But Mrs. Clinton took a very different approach herself 25 years ago as the wife of then-Gov. Bill Clinton, leading the effort to discredit women who came forward with their own stories of harassment or assault by her husband.

Campaign narratives written by reporters detailed how she honchoed the campaign team that handled “bimbo eruptions,” digging up personal papers and official records that could be used to undercut the stories told by a series of women. One top aide later recounted Mrs. Clinton’s intent to “destroy” the story of one accuser, while former adviser Dick Morris said Mrs. Clinton engaged in “blackmail” to try to force women to recant their stories.

If you were to believe the lame stream media, Little Donny’s un-collaborated descriptions of Miss Machado and her inference of those supposed remarks are somehow representative of Mr. Trumps attitude towards all women, not just hie women employees. Yet Mrs. Clinton’s and those of her paid surrogates, attacks on the scores women claiming to have some sort sexual relations with er husband, consensual and otherwise, are simply not an issue.