The late Yassar Arafat had no problem promoting suicide bombing is Israel. His wife and children lived in, then peaceful, Paris. Likewise, John “French” Kerry seems to no problem with terrorism just so long as he only has read about it, but not experience is.
A difference between Jane “Hanoi” Fonda and Kerry is that Fonda committed but one incident of treason, attempting to shot down an American aircraft, whereas Kerry has spent his entire adult life aiding and abetting enemies of the United States, by Elise Labott, CNN, via Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch [1]:
Secretary of State John Kerry acknowledged to CNBC Thursday that some of the money Iran received in sanctions relief would go to groups considered terrorists.
At what point did is occur to Kerry that giving money to Iran meant supporting yet more terrorism?
When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.
Yes considered terrorist by those blown up going to Christmas parties or running marathons, but not by nuanced Obama regime. Besides, does the Obama even care if few more Jews get blown up in Israel?
“I think that some of it will end up in the hands of the IRGC or other entities, some of which are labeled terrorists,” he said in the interview in Davos, referring to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps. “You know, to some degree, I’m not going to sit here and tell you that every component of that can be prevented.”
Kerry called the deal to Iran nuclear weapons a step towards world peace. Terrorists with nuke is hardly the recipe for peace.
But he added that “right now, we are not seeing the early delivery of funds going to that kind of endeavor at this point in time.”
But it is only a matter or time. Did Kerry make a side deal for the Moolahs to hold off till the Dim Won is out of office?
Earlier Thursday, speaking to reporters before a meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, Kerry defended the U.S. use of sanctions against Iran following charges by Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in his interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour that the recent sanctions were illegal and that some in the U.S. were “addicted” to sanctions.
Kerry logic, such as it is, sanctions are ineffective,. sanctions are good. Iran logic, all sanctions are the work of western devil. At least the moolahs are consistent.
“We have made it very clear that we use sanctions when we think they are appropriate in order to counter behavior that we believe has broken the law or has challenged the United Nations Security Council or threatened the United States, and we stand by our sanctions,” Kerry told reporters. “We think they have been used judiciously and effectively and we are looking to move on now to put to test the willingness of Iran and other countries in the region to try to reduce tensions and move in a different direction.”
To Kerry’s muddled mind, nothing is clear.
He continued, “If we catch them funding terrorism, they are going to have a problem with the United States Congress and other people, obviously.”…
Yes a problem with some, like the Congress, but not a problem for the Obama regime. The difference between Kerry and a bag of scat is the bag.