Oh a tale from two Posts, Washington and Jerusalem, first from Jennifer Rubin, Washington Post:
Critics of the president’s feeble Iran policy have known all along this was coming. If the report in the New York Times is accurate, the president is about to countenance a nuclear-armed Iran. The administration doesn’t put it that way, and the Times is compliant enough not to mention it directly, but that is precisely what is entailed: “On the eve of a new round of talks between world powers and Iran, a senior Obama administration official said Wednesday that the United States was prepared to offer Iran limited relief from economic sanctions if Tehran agreed to halt its nuclear program and reversed part of it.” The planned “relief” is to last six months, much longer than some experts believe is needed for Iran to go nuclear.
Second from the mouth of John “French” Kerry, via Jerusalem Post:
Friction over the talks has risen this past week on the back of Israeli plans, announced in tandem with its release of 26 Palestinian prisoners, for some 3,500 new homes for settlers in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
“Let me emphasize at this point the position of the United States of America on the settlements is that we consider them… to be illegitimate,” Kerry said after discussions with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas
So the regime of the Nobel Peace Prize designee Barrack Obama, supports a nuclear Iran, opposes Jews living in sovereign Israel, Jerusalem, but somehow claims to support Middle East peace. On what bloody planet is a Jew living in Jerusalem a bigger threat to peace than a nuclear Iran?
Print This Post
Subscribe to RSS feed
