CNN investigative reporter: “But the relationship between Obama and Ayers went much deeper, ran much longer, and was much more political than Obama said.”
OK. I’ve now seen it all. CNN exposes the lies of a Democrat. They even interviewed Stanley Kurtz. And Anderson Cooper doesn’t look overly happy, either, did you notice? Looks like he’s just been introduced to Limberger Cheese for the first time.
Well, OK, granted, they were kinda forced into it by the tide. But if THAT’S true, then there must be a whole bunch more tide about to be moving between now and November.
Addendum: (David L)
File under, Man bites Dog. I still sorting this one out. Brother Cash err felllow Swamp Stomper, Sister Toldjah [1], writes:
Obama can run from it but he cannot hide … not even from, of all places, a network that has been super-friendly to Democrats for well over a decade
Anderson Cooper can’t quite seem to bring himslf to call this a lie. Neither does CNN apparently feel that lying and palling around with terrorists is all that big of a deal.
Remembrr this, the only thing BO has to offer is his vaunted and much self-proclaimed judgement, a judgement which is not very impressive. The BO campaign is now defending BO’s relationship with the admitted celebrity terrorist Ayers on sheer ignorance, Geoff Earle, New York Post [2]:
Barack Obama’s top political adviser said today Obama “didn’t know the history” of unrepentant bomber William Ayers’ activities in the violent Weather Underground movement when the candidate attended a political event at Ayers’ home in 1995.
Ayers was a local celebrity in Chicago. Yet the BO campaign is claiming to be ignorant of Ayers’s much publicized history. Yeah sure. How many other of BO’s self-proclaimed great judgements are also based on sheer ignorance?