- BitsBlog - https://bitsblog.com -

Al Sharpton’s Big Mac Attack

Al Sharpton [1]

The victim of a big Mac attack today is Al Sharpton, lover of criminals, and terrorist.

How Sharpton loves criminals, Heather Mac Donald, City Journal [2]:

“Stop the killing!” Since 1993, 11,353 people have been murdered in New York City. The large majority of victims and perpetrators have been black. Not a single one of those black-on-black killings has prompted protest or demonstrations from the city’s black advocates. Sharpton, Barron, et al. are happy to let thousands of black victims get mowed down by thugs without so much as a whispered call for “peace” or “justice”; it’s only when a police officer, trying to protect the public, makes a good faith mistake in a moment of intense pressure that they rise as vindicators of black life. (As for caring about slain police officers, forget about it. Sixteen cops—including several black policemen—have been killed since 1999, not one of whom elicited a public demonstration of condolence from the race hustlers.)

New York City under Mayor David Dinkins was a poorly governed city.  Under the last two mayors, NYC has become a much better governed city and a much safer city.  Sharpton has fought the improvement in public safety every step of the way.  When black civilians murder other blacks or police offerers, Shartpon stands mute.  When a black is killed by a police officer, Shapton becomes violent.  Murder by civilian is far greater problem in New York City than a death at the hands of a police officer.  Yet Sharpton remains indifferent to murder.

While Sharpton is a criminal at heart, his methods are that of a terrorist, Mac Ranger [3]:

Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) defines that a person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act “”dangerous to human life”” that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.

Sharpton:

“We strategically know how to stop the city so people stand still and realize that you do not have the right to shoot down unarmed, innocent civilians,” Sharpton told an overflow crowd of several hundred people at his National Action Network office in the historically black Manhattan neighborhood. “This city is going to deal with the blood of Sean Bell.”

Michelle [4]offerd up a pretty fair discription of Sharpton:

[L]ying, poisonous, police-hating, crime-coddling, race-hustling agenda.

Sharpton os the darling the media.  Yet he does not belong in the green room but rather in prison.

Hat tip photo: Messenger and Advocate [5].

?