- BitsBlog - http://bitsblog.theconservativereader.com -

Reality Intrudes on the Fantasy Life of Barrack Obama Again

Barrack Obama, and a lot of the leftards like to lay the claim that [1]

“There was no such thing as al-Qaida in Iraq until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade Iraq. … They took their eye off the people who were responsible for 9/11 and that would be al-Qaida in Afghanistan, that is stronger now than at any time since 2001.”

So along comes some Intel by way of a Stephen Hayes tome in the Weekly Standard: [2]

Throughout the early and mid-1990s, Saddam Hussein actively supported an influential terrorist group headed by the man who is now al Qaeda’s second-in-command, according to an exhaustive study issued last week by the Pentagon. “Saddam supported groups that either associated directly with al Qaeda (such as the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, led at one time by bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri) or that generally shared al Qaeda’s stated goals and objectives.” According to the Pentagon study, Egyptian Islamic Jihad was one of many jihadist groups that Iraq’s former dictator funded, trained, equipped, and armed.The study was commissioned by the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia, and produced by analysts at the Institute for Defense Analyses, a federally funded military think tank. It is entitled “Iraqi Perspectives Project: Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents.” The study is based on a review of some 600,000 documents captured in postwar Iraq. Those “documents” include letters, memos, computer files, audiotapes, and videotapes produced by Saddam Hussein’s regime, especially his intelligence services. The analysis section of the study covers 59 pages. The appendices, which include copies of some of the captured documents and translations, put the entire study at approximately 1,600 pages.

An abstract that describes the study reads, in part:

Because Saddam’s security organizations and Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network operated with similar aims (at least in the short term), considerable overlap was inevitable when monitoring, contacting, financing, and training the same outside groups. This created both the appearance of and, in some way, a ‘de facto’ link between the organizations. At times, these organizations would work together in pursuit of shared goals but still maintain their autonomy and independence because of innate caution and mutual distrust. Though the execution of Iraqi terror plots was not always successful, evidence shows that Saddam’s use of terrorist tactics and his support for terrorist groups remained strong up until the collapse of the regime.

Among the study’s other notable findings:

* In 1993, as Osama bin Laden’s fighters battled Americans in Somalia, Saddam Hussein personally ordered the formation of an Iraqi terrorist group to join the battle there.

* For more than two decades, the Iraqi regime trained non-Iraqi jihadists in training camps throughout Iraq.

There’s far more of course… a rather lengthy article which breaks all this out in far more detail. It’s worth your time.

So, yet another claim of Barrack Obama is made out a lie. The anti-war left is left naked in the breeze, without even thecover of question… there is no question any longer. There were solid connections between Saddam and BinLaden.

Here it is, people: Facts disprove liberalism.

But there’s more, of course. As a Senator, were he really interested Obama might have known, had he gotten his head out from between his cheeks long enough. He had access to this intel.  But Barrack Obama isn’t interested in facts.