Jan
29
A thought occurred to me as I was driving home froma family event last evening… Is Bill Clinton really to blame for Hillary’s troubles in getting through the nomination process? Or are the Clintonistas offering him up as a target so as to deflect the main thrust of the anger away from Hillary?
See, what bothers me here is that when Bill was President, Hillary was always the one, if we trust the hype, who was busy making policy and strategy decisions. After all, this is the ‘experience’ she’s claiming. So, logically, the question comes up; Is Bubba really a loose cannon, or is he acting under direction from Hillary?
Tags: Bill Clinton, BO, Clinton, nomination, UN
January 29th, 2008 at 9:52
I don’t see any need for the question. The Clintons are joined at the spot one hundred eighty degree removed from the belly button. The Clinton are two heads of the same political animal. They really do complete each other, in the ugliest sense of the word.
(Bit Responds; True enough. However, given that Hillary’s Clinton and her handlers are now seeking to separate Bill from Hillary,and suggest that Bill’s a loose cannon, and not a part of the official campaign strategy, we really need to examine that claim in a historical sense. The fact is that even when Bill was ostensibly in charge, it was Hillary driving things. They’re now asking us to believe that what Bill is coming up with is not by direction of Hillary and her people… and that simply doesn’t make sense given the history of the couple. Thus is another of Hillary Clinton’s lies exposed as such.)