The evidence says no. Mrs. Clinton was asked how she would protect the privacy of our service personnel. Patrick Healy, New York Times [1]:
She drew another ovation, too, with her response to an Air Force major, a 20-year veteran of the service who had served three tours in Afghanistan, when he asked how she would protect the privacy of service members if she went ahead with her plan to let gays serve openly in the military.
The so-called Smartest Woman in the World lacked the first clue what privacy means:
The Air Force major, Gary Mathis of Cedar Rapids, said afterward that he appreciated Mrs. Clinton’s points about conduct, but that she had side-stepped his question about privacy – specifically, what she would do to ensure the privacy of male soldiers who shower, sleep and work out in the gym alongside other male soldiers.
Basic concerns for privacy would mean that no person should ever be forced to involunarily expose his genitals for the sexual gratification of another. Mrs. Clinton needs get out of her rose garden and out into the real world. Dare she?
Hat Tip: Memeorandum.
Edit: (David)