I get email, all the time asking me why I don’t like Ron Paul, and extolling his supposed virtues. I get the impression that they’re the product of an orginized effort on someone’s part, because they look like they were cut and pasted from one of those insult machines we see on the web from time to time. I got a few from the last comments I made about Ron Paul about a week back, which admittedly were not exactly warm and freindly, even by my standards.
So along comes Boortz this morning, who apparently is under attack by these same people, who answers them fairly well: (Hit this and scroll up a little) [1]
When Ron Paul starts to realize and speak to the threat we face from Islamic fascism, then I’ll start talking about Ron Paul. When Ron Paul sees the value in finding these Islamic goons overseas where they are and killing them here, rather than waiting until they get here, I’ll start talking about Ron Paul.
Well, yes, that would be a prerequisite to his being taken seriously for the office he seeks. And that is for anyone seeking any office, not just Paul, and not just the presidency. Without such recognition of the threat we’re up against, it seems to me he is totally unqualified for that position, or for that matter, for the position he currently holds.
Now, granted, there are certainly other pressing matters in this guy’s mental makeup that concern me, as well, and would also disqualifiy him…. (Like, the guy’s a flat out full goose bozo flake, as an example) ….but if we’re to be setting limits down on who is qualified and who is not, one must at least have the qualification of the understanding Boortz is speaking of, here.
Just for the record, that disqualifies all those currently running for the Democrat party nomnation, right out of the starting gate.