What really mattered was whether an Iraq freed from his death grip could hold him accountable in a way that nurtured hope for a better future. A carefully conducted, scrupulously fair trial could have helped undo some of the damage inflicted by his rule. It could have set a precedent for the rule of law in a country scarred by decades of arbitrary vindictiveness. It could have fostered a new national unity in an Iraq long manipulated through its religious and ethnic divisions.
It could have, but it didn’t. After a flawed, politicized and divisive trial, Mr. Hussein was handed his sentence: death by hanging…
…
Toppling Saddam Hussein did not automatically create a new and better Iraq. Executing him won’t either.
So bleats the NY Times today. I swear, these people would have defended Hitler, if only because his was a socialist party.
Tags: BitsBlog, Idiots, International affairs, Middle East Affairs, WHAT biased press?
December 29th, 2006 at 10:16
“…hold him accountable in a way that nurtured hope for a better future.”
???
Wha?
Seems like people thinking of themselves as journalists would be embarrassed by association with an editorial board spewing like this.
That’s all I can think to say besides WTF?
December 29th, 2006 at 11:25
They WOULD be embarrassed… if they didn’t agree with it.