Boortz seems to have gotten himself into some problems with the DNC idiots. [1]:
Says Boortz this morning:
“So, why all the fuss? Because I said on Friday that I honestly couldn’t make up my mind which group of people was more dangerous to the future of this country: (a) Islamic jihadist terrorists; or, (b) people who intended to vote for The Poodle for president.”
RTWT. [1]
Heck, if that’s all it takes to get ’em going, sign me up. Matter of fact, I’ll state for the record.. I know the answer to your question….I DO know who is more dangerous to America’s future… and let me be quite clear about this so there’s no mistake… and you can quote me on this:
I consider that the Kerry Voter is by far more dangerous to America’s future, and more likely to get us attacked again, than all the bloodthirsty terrorists OBL can toss at us.
The reason’s simple enough….OBL and happy his band of wandering minstrels can damage us, only to the extent that our leadership is willing to capitulate to them. Make no mistake….Kerry will do exactly that, as Boortz demonstrates, as has Kerry, himself, over the years. The enemy within is ALWAYS more dangerous.
Like it or not, we’ve had war decalred on us.. and we’ve been in that state of affairs since 1995. As Boortz points out:
bin Laden has pledged to kill as many Americans as he can. He has even set a goal of four million. Will you be one of those? How about a member of your family? The Democrats are going to nominate a man who was opposed to removing Saddam Hussein from Kuwait. A man who voted for the Iraq war, and then voted to deny the funding our troops needed to pursue that action. The Democrats are nominating a man who believes that the United Nations should have veto power over American military moves. A man who would weaken the American economy through ratification of the Kyoto Treaty and the imposition of tax increases on the very people who are now powering our economic revival.
I submit anyone willing to put such a man into office is dangerous.
Let the screaming begin.